MDD
Graphics Card Test
nVidia
GeForce 4Ti (OEM) | ATI Radeon 9700 Pro (OEM)
| ATI Radeon 9000 Pro (OEM)
Introduction
Recently
I was able to get my hands on an OEM Radeon 9000 Pro and an
OEM Radeon 9700 Pro. I have outlined in the graph below exactly
where these cards fit in the MDD family.
| Model |
Standard
Configuration |
BTO
Configuration |
| 1st
Rev. MDD FW400 |
GeForce
4MX (867MHZ)
Radeon
9000 Pro
(1GHz
& 1.25GHz)
|
GeForce
4Ti |
| MDD
FW800 |
Radeon
9000 Pro |
Radeon
9700 Pro
or
GeForce
4Ti
|
| MDD
2003 FW400* |
Radeon
9000 Pro |
GeForce
4Ti |
*
Note: The
2003 MDD
FW400 is currently still available (May 2, 2004) in single
or dual 1.25GHz configurations from your
local Apple Store. Additionally, you can find a full
list of differences here including graphic cards between
all MDD G4's and Quicksilvers.
When
I purchased my 2003 MDD, I upgraded to the GeForce 4Ti. Since
I had these cards at my disposal, I decided to benchmark all
three cards in my machine using as many tests as possible.
Before I go any further, I must point out that both the Radeon
cards were sent as samples to a local developer from ATI direct.
At least one of the cards was not the final revision available
in retail MDD's therefore the benchmark results may not be
accurate.
Since
I have no idea what revision the final models were, I have
attached these screen shots and photos of both cards in the
hope that a reader would be able to shed some light on just
how many further revisions were made to the cards before they
were officially available. I would like to know what ROM version
your Radeon 9000 Pro or Radeon 9700 Pro is running so feel
free to contact me. Additionally,
if anyone has any other information or a possible ROM update
that I can apply to them, drop me a line.
The
Radeon 9000 Pro physically looks like a final shipping card
and contains the regular barcodes and stickers. This may very
well be the case because the 9000's were available in the
first revision MDD's in 2002 (also, it's performance in a
few areas scored very well as opposed to the 9700). Both cards
were delivered to the developer in early 2003. The 9700 on
the other hand has a "Non Qualification Sample"
sticker on it and what appears to be a card version code on
another sticker.
Radeon
9000 System Profile (left) and 9700 System Profile (right)
Below
is the 9700 Pro sample sticker in place of the usual barcode

and
what appears to be the card version code

Benchmarks
*All
test results are best out of 3 for every card in every test
scenario
XBench
Graphics Tests
The
overall winner here is the Radeon 9700 Pro. The GeForce 4Ti
showed its strength in the OpenGL tests.

CineBench
2003
CineBench
results are pretty much even between the GeForce 4Ti and the
9700 Pro - Note the difference in OpenGL (h/w) scores between
Xbench and CineBench (...???)

Halo
TimeDemo
All
possible hardware settings set to maximum - Halo appears to
be very demanding on GPU's judging by these results. Overall
the GeForce 4Ti outperforms competition.

Return
to Castle Wolfenstein - MP Botmatch
All
possible hardware settings set to maximum - Pretty much neck
and neck with RTCW. The 9700 shows it's strength as resolutions
increase. The Radeon 9000 Pro, as expected , doesn't fare
as well.

Unreal
Tournament 2003 - TimeDemo (Botmatch)
All
possible hardware settings set to maximum - The GeForce 4Ti
has a slight edge in each of these tests with the 9700 Pro
trailing only marginally (note: "avg." results)

Unreal
Tournament 2003 - TimeDemo (Flyby)
All
possible hardware settings set to maximum - The FlyBy tells
a different story however with the 9700 Pro absolutely tearing
away where it matters most (high resolutions) achieving over
100 FPS at 1920x1200!

Quake
3 Arena - TimeDemo Botmatch (standard config.)
All
possible hardware settings set to maximum - Once again the
Radeon 9700 Pro shines with a very impressive 207 FPS at resolution
of 1600x1200.

Quake
3 Arena - TimeDemo Botmatch ('Boli' config.)
All
possible hardware settings set to maximum
- This
is a well known config file that is tweaked for maximum FPS
in Q3A. Obviously this it works well at lower resolutions
(a staggering 506 FPS for the Radeon 9700) however the Radeon
9700 Pro performs much better at
higher resolutions using
the original config above.

Conclusion
It
looks like a pretty even race between the two top cards. One
appears to be stronger than the other under different tests
and can't help but think that the 9700 Pro's 'revision' status
is definitely holding back its potential. If I am able to
obtain any information and perhaps even an updated ROM for
the 9700 I will rerun the tests above and update the results.
For now though, I will keep the Radeon 9700 Pro in my MDD
and monitor its performance doing day to day tasks and of
course some real gaming.